The case that shocked Australia. When the name Tom Silvagni was unveiled by the County Court of Victoria, the nation faced yet another tragic criminal case. The rape case holds up a mirror to the power and privilege held by Australia’s upper echelon. It revealed that people will protect their reputation at all costs, even by staying maintaining the workplace silence.
For the first year of the trial, the young man had court suppression orders in place to mask his identity. Such orders were justified by his lawyers as serving to protect Silvagni’s mental health and his family’s privacy.
However, when the order was lifted on the 11th of December, and the veil lifted, public trust quickly eroded. An attempt to protect the reputation of a perpetrator quickly became evidence of how concealment disintegrates credibility.
This is not a dynamic exclusive to the criminal justice system. It is one which exists in workplaces throughout Australia daily. Similar mechanisms of workplace silence operate through confidentiality agreements, internal investigations and public-relations propaganda. With a blanket intention to maintain optics as opposed to accountability. And, as evident from the Silvagni case, such efforts almost always backfire.
img
Control as an illusion
In legal proceedings, suppression orders intend to protect fair trial proceedings. In the workplace, however, employers use confidential settlements or gag clauses as contractual muzzles disguised as professionalism
An employee allegation of bullying, harassment or discrimination will usually result in a swift movement to contain the issue. Rather than resolve or investigate it. Human Resources will request “discretion.” The Communications Department releases a statement about a “respectful workplace culture.” The legal team quickly drafts up a non-disclosure agreement preventing public speaking from the victim.
The reasoning is often similar. “We are trying to protect everyone’s privacy.” “It is vital to avoid any reputational damage.” “Let’s try and handle this internally.” But suppression and secrecy don’t heal. They hide.
This process represents a short-term PR solution which will ultimately become a long-term integrity problem. Each complaint silenced sends the same message. That survival depends upon workplace silence. Employers choose to manage bad behaviour quietly, if they manage it at all.
This ultimately results in a workplace culture which rewards discretion rather than disclosure and secrecy over justice. In the Silvagni case, this secrecy created a culture which filled the public with speculation, anger and a lack of trust. In the workplace, it fuels a culture of gossip, anxiety and cynicism. When trust erodes, loyalty goes with it.
Our team can advise you on whether a “confidential” agreement breaches your rights or qualifies as adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The powerful, privileged and untouchable employee
Tom Silvagni’s story also exposes the classic privilege of the powerful. When these people commit harm, they tend to receive a level of protection ordinary individuals never would. The workplace directly mirrors this dynamic.
The senior managers, high-performing staff or “star employees” are shielded from accountability. The complaints around them get “lost.” The HR department tiptoes around them. Meanwhile, the employee who spoke up becomes labelled as “difficult.” The boss excludes them from team meetings. And writes them up for minor issues.
Retaliation can often be subtle. Hard to identify. Suddenly your employer assigns you untenable workloads. Colleagues stop communicating with you. They transfer you to a less desirable role. The boss informs your performance is no longer “up to standard.” These are the early warning signs that your employer is punishing you for choosing to exercise your rights.
The Silvagni case reminds us that both judicial and corporate systems have an instinctive desire to protect the powerful. You don’t have to face this power imbalance alone. If you are victimised for standing up for yourself, we will lodge a general protections claim on your behalf.
Cost of silence
The employers don’t contain the damage of misconduct when they hide it. It spreads.
In the Silvagni case, the surrounding secrecy ultimately deepened societal mistrust in our systems. In a workplace, it erodes morale. Staff soon recognise that misconduct is quietly suppressed rather than resolved. They stop speaking up. People withdraw from the workplace. The productivity falls. Mental health weakens.
The psychological impacts of this silencing can be severe. We have represented numerous clients experiencing anxiety, PTSD and depression as a result of bullying and harassment which has gone on ignored and minimised. Management’s refusal to respond effectively can often cause more trauma than the original incident.
This workplace silence isn’t protective and it isn’t necessary. It drives a culture of burnout, resignation and breakdowns. The silence finally breaks when a brave employee files a bullying or unfair dismissal claim. It almost always turns out the employer knew more than they admitted.
And this is why the law exists. To present employees with a voice when the systems around them fails to listen. If this is a process of silencing that you are experiencing, document all you can. Emails, text communications, meeting notes and any attempt to raise the issue. This evidence is what makes the difference between a quiet unfair dismissal and just compensation.
Image is protected more than integrity
In most workplaces, the employer will care more about how they look, rather than how they behave. The same scripted statements are used to respond to issuess raised. You are affirmed they “take these matters seriously.” And that they are “committed to a respectful workplace.” And have “conducted an internal investigation.” Nothing is taken further by employees.
This is an obsession with reputation. And it is the corporate equivalent of a suppression order. It is the same obsession which drove Silvagni’s lawyers to mask his identity. That if no one sees the damage, it didn’t happen. But this image management doesn’t amend a flawed culture, it merely conceals it. And it is employees who pay the price.
This occurs commonly in large organisations, such as hospitals, government agencies or universities. Where brand loyalty far outweighs loyalty to employees. Employers tell victims to remain silent for “the good of the team,” and to avoid “bad publicity.”
A workplace becomes unsafe when brand image matters more than integrity. Are you are in a workplace where your employer’s main concern is protecting reputation rather than protecting you? You may have a claim for workplace bullying or constructive dismissal under the Fair Work Act.
The cost of workplace silence
The victim of Silvagni’s rape spoke in her victim impact statement, of sleeplessness, trauma and a feeling that her story had been erased. This feeling that one’s story has been silenced by a system which reveres image over truth, is one tragically familiar for many workers.
Every time management ignores bullying or harassment reports, it sends a cruel and tragic message. That “your pain isn’t worth disrupting our comfort.” This is how the silencing process results in psychological harm. As victims begin to internalise the injustice they have faced, they begin to question their own validity. They lose their confidence. As their performance declines, employers use it as justification to terminate them.
Employees constantly experience this cycle. Mistreatment is treated with workplace silence, which then transforms into retaliation and eventually, dismissal. But this is a cycle which can be broken. If your employers has failed their duty to protect you and your mental health has suffered, you are entitled to compensation for this psychological injury.
You are not overreacting. And you are certainly not being dramatic. You are recognising that your trauma does not stop when you clock out. Our team has supported hundreds of workers through the same situation. Equipped with the right evidence, your employer’s workplace silence can act as your strongest proof.
The legal tools used to cause workplace silence.
Employers enforce workplace silence through subtle tools. It is vital, for your own sake, that you learn to recognise them.
Confidentiality Clauses. Employers will offer you compensation or a payout on the basis that you “do not discuss the circumstances of your departure.” This is merely code for, do not tell anyone what we did. Signing this agreement under pressure may result in its unenforceability.
Threats of defamation. Employers will often issue a threat to sue for defamation if you attempt to speak publicly. But truth is a defence to this claim, and fear of a lawsuit is often merely an intimidation tactic.
Retaliation. You will suddenly receive a negative performance review after you make a complaint. This is retaliation, and it is certainly not lawful.
Constructive dismissal. If you have been pushed to resign because your workplace has been made untenable, this isn’t a clean exit. It is a type of unfair dismissal.
These are the same tactics of suppression seen in the Silvagni case. Just dressed in workplace costumes. At A Whole New Approach, we see these tactics every day. From confidentiality clauses to forced resignation, we can help you understand your options. Before you quit or accept the company’s version of the events.
How workplace silence hinders you
Transparency isn’t just to serve the public. It is to protect you. When misconduct is handled openly, patterns of abuse are stopped. It sends a message that speaking up matters and is effective.
This is the purpose of the Respect@Work reforms. They seek to ensure employers take steps to prevent harassment and bullying, even before it has occurred. This seeks to shift the workplace from a complaint waiting game, to a proactive and accountable culture. Your employer possesses a duty to reflect transparency in every policy.
When your employer assures you they have “handled it internally,” and refuses to provide any outcomes or policies, they have failed at that duty. You have the right to request documentation and ask questions. You deserve a safe work environment.
And if they choose to retaliate you can file a general protections or potential unfair dismissal claim. Be aware that strict time limits may apply to certain claims. We can guide you through the process and enforce your rights on your behalf.
What can you do?
There are a number of things you can do today if you are the victim of silencing or mistreatment. Make sure to document everything. Save emails, screenshots, rosters and messages. Everything that shows what has been happening.
Do not resign too quickly. Leaving before you receive any professional advice can weaken your legal position. Always seek professional support. You may choose to see a GP and get a record of your psychological injury. And finally, make sure to contact us quickly. Strict time limits apply to certain claims, such as 21 days for unfair dismissals. Every step you choose to take now, seeks to protect your future claim. Your silence only helps them.
Reclaiming your voice
The lesson learnt from the Silvagni case isn’t about football or fame. It is about silence. Suppression often seeks to protect the wrong person. It sends a message that power will always prevail over the truth. Workplaces that silence employees send the same message
But you do not have to accept it. You have rights and support. And most importantly, you have a voice. Even if your employer tried to take it from you. At A Whole New Approach, it is our mission to make your voice heard. Loud and clear. Whether it be through unfair dismissal, bullying, harassment or general protections claim, we want to help transform your silence into justice.
Read more: From Gag Orders to Empowerment: Why Victoria’s NDA Ban Is a Feminist Victory in Law
Why Your Voice Matters More Than Corporate Reputation
When you look past the legal jargon, Silvagni’s case is one about truth. It reveals that concealment only protects power, not people. This is the same in every workplace. Every complaint ignored. Every abrupt and “quiet exit.” And every NDA signed. They are casual, modern suppression orders. And they impact real people.
But workplace silence does not have to be the norm. You can act. You need to demand fairness. And you can reclaim your own narrative. Justice exists when we speak about it.
If you’ve been harassed, bullied, dismissed unfairly or silenced by your employer, reach out to us today. We are not lawyers, but workplace advisors. Our team at A Whole New Approach will listen, guide, and advocate for you.
We want to make your voice heard and taken seriously. Call us at 1300 766 700.
